Start Colston Loveland or Mark Andrews? Week 5
Locks at kickoff, graded after.
Start Mark Andrews over Colston Loveland

- Market projects
- 8.2
- fantasy pts
- Snap share
- 63%
- Through Week 4
- Target share
- 24%
- Through Week 4

- Market projects
- 9.1
- fantasy pts
- GB D vs TE
- 10.6
- 13th fewest to TEs (2026)
- Snap share
- 87%
- Through Week 4
- Target share
- 15%
- Through Week 4
Make this call for your own roster
Sync your league and My Team sets this week's lineup for your actual roster, spot by spot. Free, no account.
Or get it by email
Tuesday 8am ET: one email with what moved on the board and who is worth a claim.
Free. One a week, one tap to stop.
Our Week 5 call
Start Mark Andrews over Colston Loveland in Week 5.
Market-based projections have Mark Andrews at 8.2 points and Colston Loveland at 9.1, a gap of 0.8. That is inside the noise of a single catch, so treat it as close to a coin flip.
What the market projects
Player markets imply 9.1 fantasy points for Colston Loveland, with 100 percent of the markets a TE needs posted.
The market has Colston Loveland at 36.5 receiving yards and 3.5 receptions, with a 26% chance to score a touchdown (16, 11 and 15 market sources).
Player markets imply 8.2 fantasy points for Mark Andrews, with 100 percent of the markets a TE needs posted.
The market has Mark Andrews at 28.5 receiving yards and 3.5 receptions, with a 26% chance to score a touchdown (15, 10 and 15 market sources).
That puts Colston Loveland 0.8 points ahead of Mark Andrews on the market projections.
Week 5 matchups
Colston Loveland and CHI visit GB on Sunday at 1:00 PM ET.
GB allowed 10.6 fantasy points a game to TEs this season over 4 games, the 13th fewest in the league.
Tight ends caught passes for 33 yards and 0.5 touchdowns a game against GB.
Injury status
Colston Loveland is not on the injury report.
Mark Andrews is not on the injury report.
Usage before Week 5
Through Week 4, Colston Loveland played 87 percent of CHI snaps, drew 15 percent of the targets, earned 11 percent of the air yards and had 9 percent of the red zone chances.
Colston Loveland, Week 1 against CAR: 65 of 75 snaps, 2 targets and 0 catches for 0 yards.
Colston Loveland, Week 2 against MIN: 64 of 74 snaps, 3 targets and 1 catch for 3 yards.
Colston Loveland, Week 3 against PHI: 57 of 72 snaps, 4 targets and 4 catches for 31 yards.
Colston Loveland, Week 4 against NYJ: 86 of 93 snaps, 9 targets and 6 catches for 57 yards.
Through Week 4, Mark Andrews played 63 percent of BAL snaps, drew 24 percent of the targets, earned 18 percent of the air yards and had 7 percent of the red zone chances.
Mark Andrews, Week 1 against IND: 49 of 68 snaps, 6 targets and 4 catches for 49 yards.
Mark Andrews, Week 2 against NO: 41 of 58 snaps, 7 targets and 6 catches for 49 yards.
Mark Andrews, Week 3 against DAL: 33 of 64 snaps, 5 targets and 3 catches for 24 yards.
Mark Andrews, Week 4 against TEN: 37 of 64 snaps, 6 targets and 5 catches for 27 yards, 1 touchdown.
Their 2025 seasons
In 2025, Colston Loveland played 16 games for CHI and scored 165.1 PPR points, 10.3 a game, finishing TE12.
He caught 58 of 82 targets for 713 yards and 6 touchdowns, with 14 red zone targets and 463 air yards.
He was on the field for 63 percent of the offense's snaps in the games he played.
In 2025, Mark Andrews played 17 games for BAL and scored 131.0 PPR points, 7.7 a game, finishing TE16.
He caught 48 of 70 targets for 422 yards and 5 touchdowns, with 14 red zone targets and 321 air yards.
He was on the field for 62 percent of the offense's snaps in the games he played.
Their other Week 5 calls
On the draft board
Ranked ahead
TE13 · CHI · bye 10
2026 vs anytime td line 0-4
- Overall rank
- 99
- Draft pick
- no consensus
- Tier
- 4
Ranked behind
TE15 · BAL · bye unlisted
2026 vs anytime td line 1-3
- Overall rank
- 117
- Draft pick
- no consensus
- Tier
- 4
The board cards are draft figures, not the week's call. Locks at kickoff, graded after. When the start/sit engine grades week 5, the call and the result appear on the public record, wrong ones included.
The gap between them
- Spots apart on the board18
- Pick differencenot comparable without a consensus on both
- Tiersboth in tier 4
- Board size219 draftable players
Drafting soon? Use the free live draft assistant
It reranks the board after every pick and shows who is falling past ADP at your slot. No sign in, nothing to install.
Open the draft assistant