Bucky Irving for Jalen Coker: who wins the trade?
Bucky Irving (48) and Jalen Coker (43) are close to even on rest-of-season value. Values are rest-of-season, market-based fantasy points above a replacement starter, Week 6 through Week 17, PPR.
The verdict, Week 5
Close to even.
The gap is inside the 8 points the values cannot separate, so take the player your lineup needs.
- Pts/game
- 12.3
- Games left
- 11
- Bye
- 10
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.9 | 12.3 | 11.5 |
- Pts/game
- 12.7
- Games left
- 12
- Bye
- 5
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 13.8 | 11.6 | not priced |
How to read this trade
Bucky Irving rates 12.3 market-based points a game with 11 games left, his bye in Week 10. Jalen Coker rates 12.7 with 12. They play different positions, which is why the value is measured above a replacement starter at each one: Bucky Irving is RB20 and Jalen Coker is WR17, and the deal also changes which of your lineup spots is thin. A synced league in the trade analyzer shows what the swap does to your own starting lineup, and you can add players to either side there.
Advertisement
Other close trades for Bucky Irving and Jalen Coker
The full Week 5 trade value chart
Common questions
Should I trade Bucky Irving for Jalen Coker?
On value it is close to even: Bucky Irving is 48 and Jalen Coker is 43, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Let positional need decide: take the one who starts for you.
Who has more rest-of-season value, Bucky Irving or Jalen Coker?
Bucky Irving. His market-based rate is 12.3 points a game with 11 games left, against 12.7 and 12 for Jalen Coker, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.
Where do these numbers come from?
Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based fantasy points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, in PPR. A replacement-level starter's rate is subtracted and the rest multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17. No expert opinion is involved.
By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 10, 2026 at 2:06 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number