Skip to main content
parlae.ioBeta
Sign in

Dak Prescott for Tyler Shough: who wins the trade?

Dak Prescott (17) and Tyler Shough (19) are close to even on rest-of-season value. Values are rest-of-season, market-based fantasy points above a replacement starter, Week 6 through Week 17, PPR.

The verdict, Week 5

Close to even.

Dak Prescott 1719 Tyler Shough

The gap is inside the 8 points the values cannot separate, so take the player your lineup needs.

17

value, #64

Pts/game
18.0
Games left
11
Bye
14
Dak Prescott weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
17.818.022.0

19

value, #62

Pts/game
18.2
Games left
11
Bye
8
Tyler Shough weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
18.218.916.6

How to read this trade

Dak Prescott rates 18.0 market-based points a game with 11 games left, his bye in Week 14. Tyler Shough rates 18.2 with 11, his bye in Week 8. Both are quarterbacks, so the values compare directly: Dak Prescott is QB5 and Tyler Shough is QB3 on the chart. A synced league in the trade analyzer shows what the swap does to your own starting lineup, and you can add players to either side there.

Advertisement

The full Week 5 trade value chart

Common questions

  • Should I trade Dak Prescott for Tyler Shough?

    On value it is close to even: Dak Prescott is 17 and Tyler Shough is 19, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Let positional need decide: take the one who starts for you.

  • Who has more rest-of-season value, Dak Prescott or Tyler Shough?

    Tyler Shough. His market-based rate is 18.2 points a game with 11 games left, against 18.0 and 11 for Dak Prescott, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.

  • Where do these numbers come from?

    Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based fantasy points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, in PPR. A replacement-level starter's rate is subtracted and the rest multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17. No expert opinion is involved.

By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 10, 2026 at 2:06 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number