Skip to main content
parlae.ioBeta
Sign in

Devaughn Vele for Khalil Shakir: who wins the trade?

Devaughn Vele (8) and Khalil Shakir (8) are close to even on rest-of-season value. Values are rest-of-season, market-based fantasy points above a replacement starter, Week 6 through Week 17, PPR.

The verdict, Week 5

Close to even.

Devaughn Vele 88 Khalil Shakir

The gap is inside the 8 points the values cannot separate, so take the player your lineup needs.

8

value, #73

Pts/game
9.8
Games left
11
Bye
8
Devaughn Vele weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
10.9not priced8.7

8

value, #74

Pts/game
9.8
Games left
11
Bye
7
Khalil Shakir weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
9.89.510.7

How to read this trade

Devaughn Vele rates 9.8 market-based points a game with 11 games left, his bye in Week 8. Khalil Shakir rates 9.8 with 11, his bye in Week 7. Both are receivers, so the values compare directly: Devaughn Vele is WR29 and Khalil Shakir is WR30 on the chart. A synced league in the trade analyzer shows what the swap does to your own starting lineup, and you can add players to either side there.

Advertisement

The full Week 5 trade value chart

Common questions

  • Should I trade Devaughn Vele for Khalil Shakir?

    On value it is close to even: Devaughn Vele is 8 and Khalil Shakir is 8, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Let positional need decide: take the one who starts for you.

  • Who has more rest-of-season value, Devaughn Vele or Khalil Shakir?

    Devaughn Vele. His market-based rate is 9.8 points a game with 11 games left, against 9.8 and 11 for Khalil Shakir, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.

  • Where do these numbers come from?

    Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based fantasy points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, in PPR. A replacement-level starter's rate is subtracted and the rest multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17. No expert opinion is involved.

By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 10, 2026 at 2:06 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number