Skip to main content
parlae.ioBeta
Sign in

Malik Nabers for Matthew Golden: who wins the trade?

Malik Nabers (36) and Matthew Golden (35) are close to even on rest-of-season value. Values are rest-of-season, market-based fantasy points above a replacement starter, Week 6 through Week 17, PPR.

The verdict, Week 5

Close to even.

Malik Nabers 3635 Matthew Golden

The gap is inside the 8 points the values cannot separate, so take the player your lineup needs.

36

value, #44

Pts/game
12.4
Games left
11
Bye
8
Malik Nabers weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
12.012.413.2

35

value, #46

Pts/game
12.3
Games left
11
Bye
11
Matthew Golden weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
12.312.612.3

How to read this trade

Malik Nabers rates 12.4 market-based points a game with 11 games left, his bye in Week 8. Matthew Golden rates 12.3 with 11, his bye in Week 11. Both are receivers, so the values compare directly: Malik Nabers is WR20 and Matthew Golden is WR21 on the chart. A synced league in the trade analyzer shows what the swap does to your own starting lineup, and you can add players to either side there.

Advertisement

The full Week 5 trade value chart

Common questions

  • Should I trade Malik Nabers for Matthew Golden?

    On value it is close to even: Malik Nabers is 36 and Matthew Golden is 35, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Let positional need decide: take the one who starts for you.

  • Who has more rest-of-season value, Malik Nabers or Matthew Golden?

    Malik Nabers. His market-based rate is 12.4 points a game with 11 games left, against 12.3 and 11 for Matthew Golden, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.

  • Where do these numbers come from?

    Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based fantasy points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, in PPR. A replacement-level starter's rate is subtracted and the rest multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17. No expert opinion is involved.

By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 10, 2026 at 2:06 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number