Patrick Mahomes for RJ Harvey: who wins the trade?
Patrick Mahomes (18) and RJ Harvey (17) are close to even on rest-of-season value. Values are rest-of-season, market-based fantasy points above a replacement starter, Week 6 through Week 17, PPR.
The verdict, Week 5
Close to even.
The gap is inside the 8 points the values cannot separate, so take the player your lineup needs.
- Pts/game
- 18.0
- Games left
- 12
- Bye
- 5
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 18.3 | 17.7 | not priced |
- Pts/game
- 9.4
- Games left
- 11
- Bye
- 10
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | 9.4 | 10.8 |
How to read this trade
Patrick Mahomes rates 18.0 market-based points a game with 12 games left. RJ Harvey rates 9.4 with 11, his bye in Week 10. They play different positions, which is why the value is measured above a replacement starter at each one: Patrick Mahomes is QB4 and RJ Harvey is RB27, and the deal also changes which of your lineup spots is thin. A synced league in the trade analyzer shows what the swap does to your own starting lineup, and you can add players to either side there.
Advertisement
Other close trades for Patrick Mahomes and RJ Harvey
The full Week 5 trade value chart
Common questions
Should I trade Patrick Mahomes for RJ Harvey?
On value it is close to even: Patrick Mahomes is 18 and RJ Harvey is 17, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Let positional need decide: take the one who starts for you.
Who has more rest-of-season value, Patrick Mahomes or RJ Harvey?
Patrick Mahomes. His market-based rate is 18.0 points a game with 12 games left, against 9.4 and 11 for RJ Harvey, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.
Where do these numbers come from?
Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based fantasy points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, in PPR. A replacement-level starter's rate is subtracted and the rest multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17. No expert opinion is involved.
By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 10, 2026 at 2:06 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number