Sam LaPorta for Tony Pollard: who wins the trade?
Sam LaPorta (25) and Tony Pollard (22) are close to even on rest-of-season value. Values are rest-of-season, market-based fantasy points above a replacement starter, Week 6 through Week 17, PPR.
The verdict, Week 5
Close to even.
The gap is inside the 8 points the values cannot separate, so take the player your lineup needs.
- Pts/game
- 11.8
- Games left
- 11
- Bye
- 6
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 | 11.8 | 12.4 |
- Pts/game
- 9.9
- Games left
- 11
- Bye
- 9
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.9 | 9.9 | 9.6 |
How to read this trade
Sam LaPorta rates 11.8 market-based points a game with 11 games left, his bye in Week 6. Tony Pollard rates 9.9 with 11, his bye in Week 9. They play different positions, which is why the value is measured above a replacement starter at each one: Sam LaPorta is TE7 and Tony Pollard is RB26, and the deal also changes which of your lineup spots is thin. A synced league in the trade analyzer shows what the swap does to your own starting lineup, and you can add players to either side there.
Advertisement
Other close trades for Sam LaPorta and Tony Pollard
The full Week 5 trade value chart
Common questions
Should I trade Sam LaPorta for Tony Pollard?
On value it is close to even: Sam LaPorta is 25 and Tony Pollard is 22, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Let positional need decide: take the one who starts for you.
Who has more rest-of-season value, Sam LaPorta or Tony Pollard?
Sam LaPorta. His market-based rate is 11.8 points a game with 11 games left, against 9.9 and 11 for Tony Pollard, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.
Where do these numbers come from?
Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based fantasy points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, in PPR. A replacement-level starter's rate is subtracted and the rest multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17. No expert opinion is involved.
By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 10, 2026 at 2:06 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number