Skip to main content
parlae.ioBeta
Sign in

Start Amon-Ra St. Brown or CeeDee Lamb? Week 4

Locked at kickoff. Graded after.

Start Amon-Ra St. Brown over CeeDee Lamb

Wrong: 15.5 to 41.3
Start

Amon-Ra St. Brown

WR · final

Market projected
18.9
pre-game
Snap share
96%
Week 4
Target share
22%
Week 4
Scored
15.5
PPR pts
Sit

CeeDee Lamb

WR · final

Market projected
16.4
pre-game
Snap share
86%
Week 4
Target share
49%
Week 4
Scored
41.3
PPR pts

Make this call for your own roster

Sync your league and My Team sets this week's lineup for your actual roster, spot by spot. Free, no account.

Sync my league

Or get it by email

Tuesday 8am ET: one email with what moved on the board and who is worth a claim.

Free. One a week, one tap to stop.

Our Week 4 call

Start Amon-Ra St. Brown over CeeDee Lamb in Week 4.

Market-based projections have Amon-Ra St. Brown at 18.9 points and CeeDee Lamb at 16.4, a gap of 2.5.

Advertisement

What the market projects

Player markets imply 18.9 fantasy points for Amon-Ra St. Brown, with 100 percent of the markets a WR needs posted.

The market has Amon-Ra St. Brown at 77.5 receiving yards and 6.5 receptions, with a 53% chance to score a touchdown (16, 15 and 18 market sources).

Player markets imply 16.4 fantasy points for CeeDee Lamb, with 100 percent of the markets a WR needs posted.

The market has CeeDee Lamb at 76.5 receiving yards and 5.5 receptions, with a 41% chance to score a touchdown (17, 14 and 18 market sources).

That puts Amon-Ra St. Brown 2.5 points ahead of CeeDee Lamb on the market projections.

Injury status

Amon-Ra St. Brown was not on the injury report when the call was made.

CeeDee Lamb was not on the injury report when the call was made.

Usage before Week 4

Through Week 3, Amon-Ra St. Brown played 86 percent of DET snaps, drew 32 percent of the targets, earned 37 percent of the air yards and had 21 percent of the red zone chances.

Amon-Ra St. Brown, Week 1 against NO: 69 of 77 snaps, 14 targets and 10 catches for 67 yards, 2 touchdowns.

Amon-Ra St. Brown, Week 2 against BUF: 62 of 65 snaps, 13 targets and 9 catches for 142 yards, 2 touchdowns.

Amon-Ra St. Brown, Week 3 against NYJ: 48 of 65 snaps, 8 targets and 4 catches for 19 yards, 1 touchdown.

Through Week 3, CeeDee Lamb played 80 percent of DAL snaps, drew 25 percent of the targets, earned 38 percent of the air yards and had 9 percent of the red zone chances.

CeeDee Lamb, Week 1 against NYG: 47 of 58 snaps, 1 carry for 0 yards, 8 targets and 5 catches for 44 yards, 1 touchdown.

CeeDee Lamb, Week 2 against WAS: 41 of 55 snaps, 9 targets and 8 catches for 153 yards, 2 touchdowns.

CeeDee Lamb, Week 3 against BAL: 61 of 74 snaps, 8 targets and 7 catches for 112 yards.

Their 2025 seasons

In 2025, Amon-Ra St. Brown played 17 games for DET and scored 324.0 PPR points, 19.1 a game, finishing WR3.

He caught 117 of 172 targets for 1401 yards and 11 touchdowns, with 34 red zone targets and 831 air yards.

He was on the field for 85 percent of the offense's snaps in the games he played.

In 2025, CeeDee Lamb played 14 games for DAL and scored 200.9 PPR points, 14.4 a game, finishing WR22.

He caught 75 of 117 targets for 1077 yards and 3 touchdowns, with 17 red zone targets and 754 air yards.

He was on the field for 75 percent of the offense's snaps in the games he played.

How Week 4 went

Amon-Ra St. Brown scored 15.5 PPR points and CeeDee Lamb scored 41.3.

The call was wrong: CeeDee Lamb outscored Amon-Ra St. Brown by 25.8.

Amon-Ra St. Brown finished 3.4 points below the 18.9 the market projected.

Amon-Ra St. Brown, Week 4 against CAR: 68 of 71 snaps, 11 targets and 8 catches for 75 yards, 15.5 PPR points.

Amon-Ra St. Brown finished as the week's WR20 in PPR scoring.

CeeDee Lamb finished 24.9 points above the 16.4 the market projected.

CeeDee Lamb, Week 4 against HOU: 67 of 78 snaps, 1 carry for -6 yards, 21 targets and 17 catches for 189 yards, 1 touchdown, 41.3 PPR points.

CeeDee Lamb finished as the week's WR2 in PPR scoring.

Their other Week 4 calls

On the draft board

Ranked ahead

WR3 · DET · bye 6

2026 vs anytime td line 3-1

Overall rank
6
Draft pick
no consensus
Tier
3

Ranked behind

WR11 · DAL · bye 14

2026 vs anytime td line 3-2

Overall rank
21
Draft pick
no consensus
Tier
5

The board cards are draft figures, not the week's call. This call locked at kickoff and was not edited after. It is on the public record, wrong ones included.

The gap between them

  • Spots apart on the board15
  • Pick differencenot comparable without a consensus on both
  • Tierstier 3 and tier 5
  • Board size269 draftable players

Drafting soon? Use the free live draft assistant

It reranks the board after every pick and shows who is falling past ADP at your slot. No sign in, nothing to install.

Open the draft assistant

Week 5 on the board

Elsewhere on the board