Bryce Young for Mark Andrews: who wins the trade?
Bryce Young (5) and Mark Andrews (6) are close to even on rest-of-season value. Values are rest-of-season, market-based fantasy points above a replacement starter, Week 6 through Week 17, PPR.
The verdict, Week 5
Close to even.
The gap is inside the 8 points the values cannot separate, so take the player your lineup needs.
- Pts/game
- 16.9
- Games left
- 12
- Bye
- 5
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.6 | 17.3 | not priced |
- Pts/game
- 10.0
- Games left
- 11
- Bye
- 13
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.9 | 10.0 | 8.4 |
How to read this trade
Bryce Young rates 16.9 market-based points a game with 12 games left. Mark Andrews rates 10.0 with 11, his bye in Week 13. They play different positions, which is why the value is measured above a replacement starter at each one: Bryce Young is QB8 and Mark Andrews is TE10, and the deal also changes which of your lineup spots is thin. A synced league in the trade analyzer shows what the swap does to your own starting lineup, and you can add players to either side there.
Advertisement
Other close trades for Bryce Young and Mark Andrews
The full Week 5 trade value chart
Common questions
Should I trade Bryce Young for Mark Andrews?
On value it is close to even: Bryce Young is 5 and Mark Andrews is 6, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Let positional need decide: take the one who starts for you.
Who has more rest-of-season value, Bryce Young or Mark Andrews?
Mark Andrews. His market-based rate is 10.0 points a game with 11 games left, against 16.9 and 12 for Bryce Young, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.
Where do these numbers come from?
Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based fantasy points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, in PPR. A replacement-level starter's rate is subtracted and the rest multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17. No expert opinion is involved.
By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 10, 2026 at 2:06 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number