Skip to main content
parlae.ioBeta
Sign in

Harold Fannin for Mark Andrews: who wins the trade?

Harold Fannin (7) and Mark Andrews (6) are close to even on rest-of-season value. Values are rest-of-season, market-based fantasy points above a replacement starter, Week 6 through Week 17, PPR.

The verdict, Week 5

Close to even.

Harold Fannin 76 Mark Andrews

The gap is inside the 8 points the values cannot separate, so take the player your lineup needs.

7

value, #76

Pts/game
10.1
Games left
11
Bye
11
Harold Fannin weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
9.210.310.1

6

value, #77

Pts/game
10.0
Games left
11
Bye
13
Mark Andrews weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
11.910.08.4

How to read this trade

Harold Fannin rates 10.1 market-based points a game with 11 games left, his bye in Week 11. Mark Andrews rates 10.0 with 11, his bye in Week 13. Both are tight ends, so the values compare directly: Harold Fannin is TE9 and Mark Andrews is TE10 on the chart. A synced league in the trade analyzer shows what the swap does to your own starting lineup, and you can add players to either side there.

Advertisement

The full Week 5 trade value chart

Common questions

  • Should I trade Harold Fannin for Mark Andrews?

    On value it is close to even: Harold Fannin is 7 and Mark Andrews is 6, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Let positional need decide: take the one who starts for you.

  • Who has more rest-of-season value, Harold Fannin or Mark Andrews?

    Harold Fannin. His market-based rate is 10.1 points a game with 11 games left, against 10.0 and 11 for Mark Andrews, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.

  • Where do these numbers come from?

    Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based fantasy points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, in PPR. A replacement-level starter's rate is subtracted and the rest multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17. No expert opinion is involved.

By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 10, 2026 at 2:06 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number