Chase Brown for Puka Nacua: who wins the trade?
Chase Brown (90) and Puka Nacua (90) are close to even on rest-of-season value. Values are rest-of-season, market-based fantasy points above a replacement starter, Week 6 through Week 17, PPR.
The verdict, Week 5
Close to even.
The gap is inside the 8 points the values cannot separate, so take the player your lineup needs.
- Pts/game
- 16.1
- Games left
- 11
- Bye
- 6
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.1 | 17.4 | 12.0 |
- Pts/game
- 17.3
- Games left
- 11
- Bye
- 11
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 | 17.3 | 21.5 |
How to read this trade
Chase Brown rates 16.1 market-based points a game with 11 games left, his bye in Week 6. Puka Nacua rates 17.3 with 11, his bye in Week 11. They play different positions, which is why the value is measured above a replacement starter at each one: Chase Brown is RB11 and Puka Nacua is WR5, and the deal also changes which of your lineup spots is thin. A synced league in the trade analyzer shows what the swap does to your own starting lineup, and you can add players to either side there.
Advertisement
Other close trades for Chase Brown and Puka Nacua
The full Week 5 trade value chart
Common questions
Should I trade Chase Brown for Puka Nacua?
On value it is close to even: Chase Brown is 90 and Puka Nacua is 90, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Let positional need decide: take the one who starts for you.
Who has more rest-of-season value, Chase Brown or Puka Nacua?
Chase Brown. His market-based rate is 16.1 points a game with 11 games left, against 17.3 and 11 for Puka Nacua, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.
Where do these numbers come from?
Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based fantasy points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, in PPR. A replacement-level starter's rate is subtracted and the rest multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17. No expert opinion is involved.
By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 10, 2026 at 2:06 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number