Skip to main content
parlae.ioBeta
Sign in

Chris Olave for Puka Nacua: who wins the trade?

Chris Olave (90) and Puka Nacua (90) are close to even on rest-of-season value. Values are rest-of-season, market-based fantasy points above a replacement starter, Week 6 through Week 17, PPR.

The verdict, Week 5

Close to even.

Chris Olave 9090 Puka Nacua

The gap is inside the 8 points the values cannot separate, so take the player your lineup needs.

90

value, #14

Pts/game
17.3
Games left
11
Bye
8
Chris Olave weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
17.319.416.9

90

value, #15

Pts/game
17.3
Games left
11
Bye
11
Puka Nacua weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
3.017.321.5

How to read this trade

Chris Olave rates 17.3 market-based points a game with 11 games left, his bye in Week 8. Puka Nacua rates 17.3 with 11, his bye in Week 11. Both are receivers, so the values compare directly: Chris Olave is WR4 and Puka Nacua is WR5 on the chart. A synced league in the trade analyzer shows what the swap does to your own starting lineup, and you can add players to either side there.

Advertisement

The full Week 5 trade value chart

Common questions

  • Should I trade Chris Olave for Puka Nacua?

    On value it is close to even: Chris Olave is 90 and Puka Nacua is 90, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Let positional need decide: take the one who starts for you.

  • Who has more rest-of-season value, Chris Olave or Puka Nacua?

    Chris Olave. His market-based rate is 17.3 points a game with 11 games left, against 17.3 and 11 for Puka Nacua, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.

  • Where do these numbers come from?

    Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based fantasy points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, in PPR. A replacement-level starter's rate is subtracted and the rest multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17. No expert opinion is involved.

By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 10, 2026 at 1:31 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number