Start Mike Evans or Christian Watson? Week 6
Locks at kickoff, graded after.
Start Mike Evans over Christian Watson

- Market projects
- 17.8
- fantasy pts
- Snap share
- 58%
- Through Week 5
- Target share
- 25%
- Through Week 5

- Market projects
- 14.7
- fantasy pts
- Snap share
- 79%
- Through Week 5
- Target share
- 22%
- Through Week 5
Make this call for your own roster
Sync your league and My Team sets this week's lineup for your actual roster, spot by spot. Free, no account.
Or get it by email
Tuesday 8am ET: one email with what moved on the board and who is worth a claim.
Free. One a week, one tap to stop.
Our Week 6 call
Start Mike Evans over Christian Watson in Week 6.
Market-based projections have Mike Evans at 17.8 points and Christian Watson at 14.7, a gap of 3.1.
Advertisement
What the market projects
Player markets imply 17.8 fantasy points for Mike Evans, with 100 percent of the markets a WR needs posted.
The market has Mike Evans at 75.5 receiving yards and 5.5 receptions, with a 54% chance to score a touchdown (7, 8 and 10 market sources).
Player markets imply 14.7 fantasy points for Christian Watson, with 100 percent of the markets a WR needs posted.
The market has Christian Watson at 67.5 receiving yards and 4.5 receptions, with a 43% chance to score a touchdown (10, 8 and 10 market sources).
That puts Mike Evans 3.1 points ahead of Christian Watson on the market projections.
Injury status
Mike Evans is not on the injury report.
Christian Watson is not on the injury report.
Usage before Week 6
Through Week 5, Mike Evans played 58 percent of SF snaps, drew 25 percent of the targets, earned 43 percent of the air yards and had 12 percent of the red zone chances.
Mike Evans, Week 2 against MIA: 28 of 52 snaps, 3 targets and 3 catches for 54 yards.
Mike Evans, Week 3 against ARI: 18 of 54 snaps, 6 targets and 3 catches for 34 yards, 2 touchdowns.
Mike Evans, Week 4 against DEN: 39 of 66 snaps, 8 targets and 5 catches for 76 yards.
Mike Evans, Week 5 against SEA: 38 of 60 snaps, 10 targets and 7 catches for 113 yards, 1 touchdown.
Through Week 5, Christian Watson played 79 percent of GB snaps, drew 22 percent of the targets, earned 31 percent of the air yards and had 13 percent of the red zone chances.
Christian Watson, Week 2 against NYJ: 53 of 59 snaps, 11 targets and 4 catches for 41 yards, 1 touchdown.
Christian Watson, Week 3 against ATL: 53 of 66 snaps, 10 targets and 7 catches for 96 yards, 1 touchdown.
Christian Watson, Week 4 against TB: 41 of 60 snaps, 3 targets and 3 catches for 47 yards.
Christian Watson, Week 5 against CHI: 49 of 61 snaps, 8 targets and 6 catches for 143 yards, 2 touchdowns.
Their 2025 seasons
In 2025, Mike Evans played 8 games for TB and scored 84.8 PPR points, 10.6 a game, finishing WR76.
He caught 30 of 61 targets for 368 yards and 3 touchdowns, with 8 red zone targets and 331 air yards.
He was on the field for 65 percent of the offense's snaps in the games he played.
In 2025, Christian Watson played 10 games for GB and scored 132.4 PPR points, 13.2 a game, finishing WR46.
He caught 35 of 55 targets for 611 yards and 6 touchdowns, with 6 red zone targets and 493 air yards.
He was on the field for 68 percent of the offense's snaps in the games he played.
Their other Week 6 calls
On the draft board
Ranked ahead
WR3 · SF · bye 8
2026 vs anytime td line 3-2
- Overall rank
- 7
- Draft pick
- no consensus
- Tier
- 3
Ranked behind
WR6 · GB · bye 11
2026 vs anytime td line 4-1
- Overall rank
- 11
- Draft pick
- no consensus
- Tier
- 5
The board cards are draft figures, not the week's call. Locks at kickoff, graded after. When the start/sit engine grades week 6, the call and the result appear on the public record, wrong ones included.
The gap between them
- Spots apart on the board4
- Pick differencenot comparable without a consensus on both
- Tierstier 3 and tier 5
- Board size169 draftable players
Drafting soon? Use the free live draft assistant
It reranks the board after every pick and shows who is falling past ADP at your slot. No sign in, nothing to install.
Open the draft assistant