Start Cam Ward or Tyson Bagent? Week 6
Locks at kickoff, graded after.
Start Tyson Bagent over Cam Ward
- Market projects
- 14.5
- recent weeks avg
- ATL D vs QB
- 19.1
- 13th most to QBs (2026)
- Snap share
- 63%
- Through Week 5
- Market projects
- 11.1
- fantasy pts
- Snap share
- 100%
- Through Week 5
Make this call for your own roster
Sync your league and My Team sets this week's lineup for your actual roster, spot by spot. Free, no account.
Or get it by email
Tuesday 8am ET: one email with what moved on the board and who is worth a claim.
Free. One a week, one tap to stop.
Our Week 6 call
Start Tyson Bagent over Cam Ward in Week 6.
Market-based projections have Tyson Bagent at 14.5 points and Cam Ward at 11.1, a gap of 3.3. No player market is posted for Tyson Bagent this week yet, so his 14.5 is the average of his market-based projections in Weeks 3, 4 and 5 (10.6, 17.0 and 15.8); the call is rebuilt when his market posts.
Advertisement
What the market projects
No Week 6 player market is posted for Tyson Bagent yet. His market-based projections were 10.6, 17.0 and 15.8 points in Weeks 3, 4 and 5, an average of 14.5, which stands in until his Week 6 market posts.
Player markets imply 11.1 fantasy points for Cam Ward, with 100 percent of the markets a QB needs posted.
The market-based projection for Cam Ward is 201 passing yards, 0-1 passing touchdowns and 12 rushing yards, with a 18% chance to score a touchdown (9, 9, 13 and 12 market sources).
That puts Tyson Bagent 3.3 points ahead of Cam Ward on these projections.
Week 6 matchups
Tyson Bagent and CHI visit ATL on Sunday at 1:00 PM ET.
ATL allowed 19.1 fantasy points a game to QBs this season over 5 games, the 13th most in the league.
Quarterbacks threw for 261 yards and 1.8 touchdowns a game against ATL, with 0.2 interceptions.
Injury status
Tyson Bagent is not on the injury report.
Cam Ward is not on the injury report.
Usage before Week 6
Through Week 5, Tyson Bagent played 63 percent of CHI snaps, dropped back 70 times and threw an average of 6.9 air yards per attempt.
Tyson Bagent, Week 2 against MIN: 10 of 74 snaps, 5 of 8 passes for 54 yards, 0 touchdowns and 0 interceptions.
Tyson Bagent, Week 4 against NYJ: 93 of 93 snaps, 25 of 34 passes for 268 yards, 0 touchdowns and 1 interception, 1 carry for 4 yards.
Tyson Bagent, Week 5 against GB: 46 of 69 snaps, 12 of 21 passes for 87 yards, 0 touchdowns and 2 interceptions, 3 carries for 17 yards.
Through Week 5, Cam Ward played 100 percent of TEN snaps, dropped back 176 times and threw an average of 7.0 air yards per attempt.
Cam Ward, Week 2 against PHI: 53 of 53 snaps, 13 of 20 passes for 183 yards, 0 touchdowns and 0 interceptions, 4 carries for 7 yards.
Cam Ward, Week 3 against NYG: 60 of 60 snaps, 23 of 36 passes for 181 yards, 1 touchdown and 1 interception, 1 carry for 2 yards.
Cam Ward, Week 4 against BAL: 64 of 64 snaps, 20 of 31 passes for 222 yards, 1 touchdown and 1 interception, 4 carries for 27 yards.
Cam Ward, Week 5 against HOU: 63 of 63 snaps, 23 of 36 passes for 170 yards, 0 touchdowns and 1 interception, 1 carry for 2 yards.
Their 2025 seasons
In 2025, Tyson Bagent played 3 games for CHI and scored 2.6 PPR points, 0.9 a game, finishing QB67.
He completed 3 of 4 passes for 47 yards, 0 touchdowns and 0 interceptions, and ran 2 times for 7 yards and 0 touchdowns.
He was on the field for 1 percent of the offense's snaps in the games he played.
In 2025, Cam Ward played 17 games for TEN and scored 193.7 PPR points, 11.4 a game, finishing QB22.
He completed 323 of 540 passes for 3169 yards, 15 touchdowns and 7 interceptions, and ran 39 times for 159 yards and 2 touchdowns.
He was on the field for 100 percent of the offense's snaps in the games he played.
Their other Week 6 calls
On the draft board
Ranked ahead
QB27 · TEN · bye 9
2026 vs pass yds line 2-3
- Overall rank
- 151
- Draft pick
- no consensus
- Tier
- 7
Ranked behind
QB · CHI · bye unlisted
- Overall rank
- not on the board
- Draft pick
- no consensus
- Tier
- not tiered
The board cards are draft figures, not the week's call. Locks at kickoff, graded after. When the start/sit engine grades week 6, the call and the result appear on the public record, wrong ones included.
The gap between them
- Spots apart on the boardone of them is not on the board
- Pick differencenot comparable without a consensus on both
- Tiersnot tiered
- Board size200 draftable players
Drafting soon? Use the free live draft assistant
It reranks the board after every pick and shows who is falling past ADP at your slot. No sign in, nothing to install.
Open the draft assistant