Should I start Malik Nabers or Jameson Williams in Week 10?
Updated Nov 10, 11:11 AM ET. Week 11 answers post Tuesday.
Latest
- : Malik Nabers: Listed Questionable (Undisclosed) (Sleeper injury feed)
Start Malik Nabers: his market-based projection is 4.0 points a game ahead of Jameson Williams's this season.
Should I drop Jameson Williams for Malik Nabers?
Yes, on the rest of the season. Malik Nabers projects 111 market-implied PPR points from Week 10 through Week 17 (13.9 a game over 8 games), Jameson Williams 91 (11.4 a game over 8 games).
Parlae may earn a commission from price links.
Your next move
More fantasy football tools and rankings, all built from the same board.
Both players' season market-based projection, their usage this season and their last full season's numbers.
WR5 · NYG · bye 8
2026 vs anytime td line 2-6
- Market-based projection
- 15.2 pts a game
WR7 · DET · bye 6
2026 vs anytime td line 3-6
- Market-based projection
- 11.2 pts a game
Make this call for your own roster
Sync your league and My Team sets this week's lineup for your actual roster, spot by spot. Free, no account.
Or get it by email
Tuesday 7am ET: one email with what moved on the board and who is worth a claim.
Free. One a week, one tap to stop.
The gap
- Price difference4.0 points a game
- Board size307 draftable players
Draft data is not current for these two, so the figures that depend on it are left out. The call above comes from the market projection.
The market-based projections
Malik Nabers's market-based projection is 15.2 PPR points a game, built from 3 markets across 14 market sources. That is the 12th highest figure of the 208 players with a market-based projection.
Jameson Williams's market-based projection is 11.2 PPR points a game, built from 3 markets across 9 market sources. That is the 16th highest figure of the 208 players with a market-based projection.
Where the draft room stands
Live drafts hold no current pick on Malik Nabers, and the board ranks him 12th overall on the rest of his evidence.
By format he goes standard: ADP 12; 2QB: ADP 27.
Live drafts hold no current pick on Jameson Williams, and the board ranks him 19th overall on the rest of his evidence.
This season through Week 9
Through Week 9, Malik Nabers has been on the field for 77 percent of NYG snaps, drawn 30 percent of the targets and had 16 percent of the red zone chances.
He has taken 19 of the offence's 71 third down targets, had 2 of its 15 chances inside the five and seen 13 of its 33 two minute targets.
His 78 targets have averaged 11.4 air yards.
In Week 6 against NO he caught 12 of 15 targets for 165 yards and did not score.
In Week 7 against HOU he caught 7 of 9 targets for 111 yards and did not score.
In Week 9 against PHI he caught 5 of 8 targets for 43 yards and did not score.
Through Week 9, Jameson Williams has been on the field for 88 percent of DET snaps, drawn 17 percent of the targets and had 8 percent of the red zone chances.
He has taken 12 of the offence's 67 third down targets, had 0 of its 23 chances inside the five and seen 7 of its 30 two minute targets.
His 46 targets have averaged 15.3 air yards.
In Week 7 against GB he caught 5 of 9 targets for 91 yards and scored 2 touchdowns.
In Week 8 against MIN he caught 4 of 6 targets for 70 yards and scored 1 touchdown.
In Week 9 against MIA he carried 1 time for 9 yards, caught 1 of 2 targets for 31 yards and did not score.
Their 2025 seasons
In 2025 Malik Nabers played 4 games and scored 57.1 PPR points, 14.3 a game, finishing WR101.
He caught 18 of 35 targets for 271 yards and 2 touchdowns, with 3 red zone targets.
That came to 8.8 targets a game, a 51 percent catch rate and 15.1 yards a catch.
He was on the field for 78 percent of the snaps in the games he played.
In 2025 Jameson Williams played 17 games and scored 219.9 PPR points, 12.9 a game, finishing WR12.
He caught 65 of 102 targets for 1117 yards and 7 touchdowns, with 8 red zone targets.
That came to 6.0 targets a game, a 64 percent catch rate and 17.2 yards a catch.
He was on the field for 90 percent of the snaps in the games he played.
Jameson Williams was available for 13 games more.
Head to head
In 2025 Malik Nabers scored 14.3 PPR points a game and Jameson Williams 12.9, 1.3 a game between them.
Malik Nabers finished WR101 that year and Jameson Williams WR12.
Jameson Williams had 67 more targets than Malik Nabers, 102 to 35.
Jameson Williams had 846 more receiving yards than Malik Nabers, 1117 to 271.
This season Jameson Williams holds the bigger snap share, 88 percent against 77 percent.
This season Malik Nabers holds the bigger target share, 30 percent against 17 percent.
Byes and availability
Malik Nabers is off in Week 8 and Jameson Williams in Week 6, so either can cover the other's bye.
What would change the answer
4.0 points a game is the entire case. The market restates it every week, and a line that moves moves the order with it.
The draft market is the half that is missing: when live drafts hold these two again they can order them differently from the projection, and this page will follow the drafts rather than the market-based projection when they do.
Drop or keep
Should I drop Jameson Williams for Malik Nabers?
Yes, on the rest of the season. Malik Nabers projects 111 market-implied PPR points from Week 10 through Week 17 (13.9 a game over 8 games), Jameson Williams 91 (11.4 a game over 8 games).
Should I drop Malik Nabers for Jameson Williams?
No. Keep Malik Nabers: he projects 111 market-implied PPR points from Week 10 through Week 17 (13.9 a game over 8 games), Jameson Williams 91 (11.4 a game over 8 games).
Should I drop Jameson Williams?
Both players in full
Week 10 on the board
- Is Malik Nabers playing Week 10?
- Is Jameson Williams playing Week 10?
- Giants depth chart
- Lions depth chart
- Week 10 WR rankings
- Week 10 fantasy rankings
- Week 10 start or sit
- Week 10 waiver wire
- Week 10 trade value chart
- Trade deadline buy low, sell high
- Fantasy football rankings
- Start 'em sit 'em Week 10
- Waiver wire pickups
- Fantasy sleepers
- Rest of season rankings
- Week 10 kicker rankings
- Week 10 defense rankings








