Skip to main content

Trade Bhayshul Tuten for Tyler Warren? Close to even, 37 to 29.

Close to even. On rest-of-season value Bhayshul Tuten is 37 and Tyler Warren is 29, a 8 point edge to Tuten that sits inside the 8 points these values cannot separate. Take the one your lineup is short of. Tuten rates 12.1 market points a game with 10 games left, Warren 12.3 with 10. On usage, Tuten has 58 percent of JAX carries and 8 percent of its targets; Warren has drawn 22 percent of IND targets. Tuten is on bye in Week 7; Warren is at MIN in Week 7 (fewest points allowed to TEs). Tyler Warren is listed Questionable (groin).

The verdict, Week 7

Close to even.

Bhayshul Tuten 3729 Tyler Warren

Advertisement

Run this trade in the analyzer

Both sides are filled in. Add a player to either side to check a two for one.

In a dynasty league? Run it in the dynasty trade calculator.

See it against your lineup

Sync your league and the analyzer shows your best starting lineup before and after the deal. Free, no account.

Parlae may earn a commission from price links.

37

value, #42

Pts/game
12.1
Games left
10
Bye
7
Bhayshul Tuten weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5Wk 6Wk 7
10.912.013.412.1no projection

TE5INDQuestionable

29

value, #48

Pts/game
12.3
Games left
10
Bye
13
Tyler Warren weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5Wk 6Wk 7
10.912.812.313.31.8

Where the values come from

Tuten is the 20th running back on the chart and 42nd overall. His 12.1 a game is 3.7 above the replacement running back's 8.4, over 10 games left with his bye in Week 7, which is how he comes to 37.

Warren is the 5th tight end on the chart and 48th overall. His 12.3 a game is 2.9 above the replacement tight end's 9.4, over 10 games left with his bye in Week 13, which is how he comes to 29.

The weekly projections

Parlae's market-based projections had Bhayshul Tuten at 10.9 in Week 3, 12.0 in Week 4, 13.4 in Week 5 and 12.1 in Week 6, a median of 12.1 points a game, up 1.2 from his first frozen week to his latest.

Parlae's market-based projections had Tyler Warren at 10.9 in Week 3, 12.8 in Week 4, 12.3 in Week 5, 13.3 in Week 6 and 1.8 in Week 7, a median of 12.3 points a game, down 9.1 from his first frozen week to his latest.

Advertisement

Points so far against the price

Bhayshul Tuten has scored 88.4 PPR points in 6 games, 14.7 a game, 2.6 a game more than the 12.1 he is projected for from here.

Last season he finished RB53 with 88.6 PPR points in 15 games, 5.9 a game.

Week 1 vs CLE: 9.8 points (RB28 that week), 66 rushing yards on 15 carries, 1 of 1 target for 22 yards, 49 percent of snaps.

Week 2 vs DEN: 14.2 points (RB12 that week), 65 rushing yards on 13 carries, 2 of 2 targets for -3 yards, 1 touchdown, 51 percent of snaps.

Week 3 vs NE: 17.0 points (RB11 that week), 73 rushing yards on 15 carries, 2 of 2 targets for 17 yards, 1 touchdown, 48 percent of snaps.

Week 4 vs CIN: 11.1 points (RB28 that week), 73 rushing yards on 17 carries, 2 of 2 targets for 18 yards, 59 percent of snaps.

Week 5 vs PHI: 11.6 points (RB23 that week), 72 rushing yards on 22 carries, 2 of 3 targets for 24 yards, 68 percent of snaps.

Week 6 vs HOU: 24.7 points (RB3 that week), 39 rushing yards on 12 carries, 4 of 4 targets for 48 yards, 2 touchdowns, 58 percent of snaps.

Tyler Warren has scored 69.9 PPR points in 5 games, 14.0 a game, 1.7 a game more than the 12.3 he is projected for from here.

Last season he finished TE4 with 188.5 PPR points in 17 games, 11.1 a game.

Week 1 vs BAL: 10.3 points (TE14 that week), 3 of 5 targets for 13 yards, 1 touchdown, 93 percent of snaps.

Week 2 vs KC: 14.4 points (TE10 that week), 3 rushing yards on 1 carry, 6 of 7 targets for 21 yards, 1 touchdown, 89 percent of snaps.

Week 3 vs HOU: 14.7 points (TE10 that week), 2 rushing yards on 1 carry, 9 of 10 targets for 55 yards, 94 percent of snaps.

Week 4 vs WAS: 9.1 points (TE21 that week), 5 of 5 targets for 41 yards, 85 percent of snaps.

Week 5 vs PIT: 21.4 points (TE5 that week), 1 rushing yards on 1 carry, 7 of 9 targets for 83 yards, 1 touchdown, 94 percent of snaps.

Usage a game this season

Through Week 6, Bhayshul Tuten has averaged 15.7 carries for 65 yards and 2.3 targets and 2.2 catches for 21 yards a game on 56 percent of the snaps.

He has been targeted or handed the ball 19 times inside the 20, 31 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 4 touchdowns in 6 games.

In Week 6 against HOU he had 12 carries and 4 targets on 58 percent of the snaps.

Through Week 5, Tyler Warren has averaged 0.6 carries for 1 yard and 7.2 targets and 6.0 catches for 43 yards a game on 91 percent of the snaps.

He has been targeted or handed the ball 5 times inside the 20, 11 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 3 touchdowns in 5 games.

In Week 5 against PIT he had 1 carry and 9 targets on 94 percent of the snaps.

Schedule and next matchup

A trade made now buys Week 7 through Week 17. Bhayshul Tuten has 10 games in it with his bye in Week 7; Tyler Warren has 10 games with his bye in Week 13.

MIN, Warren's Week 7 opponent, has allowed 7.6 PPR points a game to TEs this season over 5 games, the fewest to TEs of 32.

The full Week 7 trade value chart

Week 7 on the board

Common questions

  • Should I trade Bhayshul Tuten for Tyler Warren?

    It is close to even: Bhayshul Tuten is 37 and Tyler Warren is 29 on rest-of-season value, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Take the one who starts for you.

  • Who has more rest-of-season value, Bhayshul Tuten or Tyler Warren?

    Bhayshul Tuten, 37 to 29. He rates 12.1 market points a game over 10 games left, against 12.3 over 10 for Tyler Warren, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.

  • How are these trade values calculated?

    Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based PPR points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. A replacement starter's rate is subtracted and the rest is multiplied by his games from Week 7 to Week 17, bye taken out. No expert opinion is involved.

By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 22, 2026 at 2:11 AM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number