Skip to main content

Trade Hunter Henry for Malik Washington? Close to even, 2 to 9.

Close to even. On rest-of-season value Hunter Henry is 2 and Malik Washington is 9, a 7 point edge to Washington that sits inside the 8 points these values cannot separate. Take the one your lineup is short of. Henry rates 9.6 market points a game with 9 games left, Washington 10.0 with 10. On usage, Henry has drawn 15 percent of NE targets; Washington has drawn 26 percent of MIA targets. Henry is at MIA in Week 8 (3rd most points allowed to TEs); Washington hosts NE in Week 8 (13th most points allowed to WRs). Malik Washington is listed Questionable (knee).

The verdict, Week 8

Close to even.

Hunter Henry 29 Malik Washington

Advertisement

Run this trade in the analyzer

Both sides are filled in. Add a player to either side to check a two for one.

In a dynasty league? Run it in the dynasty trade calculator.

See it against your lineup

Sync your league and the analyzer shows your best starting lineup before and after the deal. Free, no account.

Parlae may earn a commission from price links.

2

value, #86

Pts/game
9.6
Games left
9
Bye
11
Hunter Henry weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5Wk 6Wk 7Wk 8
9.7no projection9.6no projection8.99.8

WR31MIAQuestionable

9

value, #72

Pts/game
10.0
Games left
10
Bye
6
Malik Washington weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5Wk 6Wk 7Wk 8
8.69.010.5no projection10.010.0

Where the values come from

Henry is the 11th tight end on the chart and 86th overall. His 9.6 a game is 0.2 above the replacement tight end's 9.4, over 9 games left with his bye in Week 11, which is how he comes to 2.

Washington is the 31st receiver on the chart and 72nd overall. His 10.0 a game is 0.9 above the replacement receiver's 9.1, over 10 games left with no bye left, which is how he comes to 9.

The weekly projections

Parlae's market-based projections had Hunter Henry at 9.7 in Week 3, 9.6 in Week 5, 8.9 in Week 7 and 9.8 in Week 8, a median of 9.6 points a game, flat across them.

Parlae's market-based projections had Malik Washington at 8.6 in Week 3, 9.0 in Week 4, 10.5 in Week 5, 10.0 in Week 7 and 10.0 in Week 8, a median of 10.0 points a game, up 1.4 from his first frozen week to his latest.

Advertisement

Points so far against the price

Hunter Henry has scored 67.6 PPR points in 7 games, 9.7 a game, level with the 9.6 he is projected for from here.

Last season he finished TE9 with 178.8 PPR points in 17 games, 10.5 a game.

Week 1 vs SEA: 5.6 points (TE25 that week), 3 of 3 targets for 26 yards, 76 percent of snaps.

Week 2 vs PIT: 7.0 points (TE22 that week), 3 of 5 targets for 40 yards, 91 percent of snaps.

Week 3 vs JAX: 1.5 points (TE56 that week), 1 of 2 targets for 5 yards, 70 percent of snaps.

Week 4 vs BUF: 11.2 points (TE17 that week), 5 of 5 targets for 62 yards, 64 percent of snaps.

Week 5 vs LV: 13.4 points (TE10 that week), 3 of 4 targets for 44 yards, 1 touchdown, 64 percent of snaps.

Week 6 vs NYJ: 14.8 points (TE7 that week), 4 of 5 targets for 48 yards, 1 touchdown, 76 percent of snaps.

Week 7 vs CHI: 14.1 points (TE8 that week), 7 of 7 targets for 71 yards, 76 percent of snaps.

Malik Washington has scored 56.7 PPR points in 6 games, 9.5 a game, 0.5 a game less than the 10.0 he is projected for from here.

Last season he finished WR54 with 116.7 PPR points in 17 games, 6.9 a game.

Week 1 vs LV: 6.3 points (WR61 that week), 3 of 8 targets for 53 yards, 98 percent of snaps.

Week 2 vs SF: 8.7 points (WR41 that week), 4 rushing yards on 1 carry, 4 of 5 targets for 43 yards, 73 percent of snaps.

Week 3 vs KC: 11.1 points (WR39 that week), 5 rushing yards on 2 carries, 5 of 10 targets for 56 yards, 86 percent of snaps.

Week 4 vs MIN: 12.0 points (WR35 that week), 3 rushing yards on 2 carries, 5 of 5 targets for 67 yards, 87 percent of snaps.

Week 5 vs CIN: 12.1 points (WR25 that week), 18 rushing yards on 1 carry, 6 of 8 targets for 43 yards, 80 percent of snaps.

Week 7 vs NYJ: 6.5 points (WR43 that week), 8 rushing yards on 2 carries, 3 of 3 targets for 27 yards, 80 percent of snaps.

Usage a game this season

Through Week 7, Hunter Henry has averaged 4.4 targets and 3.7 catches for 42 yards a game on 73 percent of the snaps.

He has been targeted or handed the ball 5 times inside the 20, 9 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 2 touchdowns in 7 games.

In Week 7 against CHI he had 7 targets on 76 percent of the snaps.

Through Week 7, Malik Washington has averaged 1.3 carries for 6 yards and 6-7 targets and 4.3 catches for 48 yards a game on 84 percent of the snaps.

He has been targeted or handed the ball 5 times inside the 20, 10 percent of his team's chances there, and has not scored in 6 games.

In Week 7 against NYJ he had 2 carries and 3 targets on 80 percent of the snaps.

Schedule and next matchup

A trade made now buys Week 8 through Week 17. Hunter Henry has 9 games in it with his bye in Week 11; Malik Washington has 10 games with no bye left.

MIA, Henry's Week 8 opponent, has allowed 21.1 PPR points a game to TEs this season over 6 games, the 3rd most to TEs of 32.

NE, Washington's Week 8 opponent, has allowed 32.1 PPR points a game to WRs this season over 7 games, the 13th most to WRs of 32.

The full Week 8 trade value chart

Week 8 on the board

Common questions

  • Should I trade Hunter Henry for Malik Washington?

    It is close to even: Hunter Henry is 2 and Malik Washington is 9 on rest-of-season value, inside the 8 points the values cannot separate. Take the one who starts for you.

  • Who has more rest-of-season value, Hunter Henry or Malik Washington?

    Malik Washington, 9 to 2. He rates 10.0 market points a game over 10 games left, against 9.6 over 9 for Hunter Henry, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.

  • How are these trade values calculated?

    Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based PPR points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. A replacement starter's rate is subtracted and the rest is multiplied by his games from Week 8 to Week 17, bye taken out. No expert opinion is involved.

By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 29, 2026 at 8:56 AM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number