Skip to main content

Should I start Fernando Mendoza or Daniel Jones in Week 10?

Updated Nov 10, 3:21 PM ET.

Week 10 verdict

Start

QB · IND · vs MIA

Market projects
12.5
recent weeks avg
MIA D vs QB
20.6
4th most to QBs (2026)
Upside
Rising
73 of 100 at QB
Snap share
98%
Through Week 9
Sit

QB · LV · vs SEA

Market projects
11.7
fantasy pts
SEA D vs QB
11.9
2nd fewest to QBs (2026)
Snap share
17%
Through Week 5
Start Jones or Mendoza? The full Week 10 breakdown

Start Daniel Jones: 93 percent of the snaps and 0 percent of the targets over their last 3 games, against Fernando Mendoza's 17 percent of the snaps and 0 percent of the targets. No market projection is posted on either of them this week, so this is a usage call, and a lower confidence one than a call made on a projection. What follows is what each of them has done.

Parlae may earn a commission from price links.

Your next move

More fantasy football tools and rankings, all built from the same board.

Both players' season market-based projection, their usage this season and their last full season's numbers.

QB10 · LV · bye 13

Market-based projection
10.5 pts a game

QB24 · IND · bye 13

2026 vs pass yds line 3-6

Market-based projection
14.6 pts a game Wk 9 price
Overall rank
205

Make this call for your own roster

Sync your league and My Team sets this week's lineup for your actual roster, spot by spot. Free, no account.

Sync my league

Or get it by email

Tuesday 7am ET: one email with what moved on the board and who is worth a claim.

Free. One a week, one tap to stop.

The gap

  • Board size307 draftable players

Draft data is not current for these two, so the figures that depend on it are left out. The call above comes from each player's usage.

Where the draft room stands

Live drafts hold no current pick on Fernando Mendoza, and the board ranks him 35th overall on the rest of his evidence.

Live drafts hold no current pick on Daniel Jones, and the board ranks him 205th overall on the rest of his evidence.

In 2QB drafts he goes at ADP 34.

The market-based projections

Fernando Mendoza's market-based projection is 10.5 PPR points a game, built from 5 markets across 4 market sources. That is the 27th highest figure of the 209 players with a market-based projection.

The market-based projection for Daniel Jones is 0.9 PPR points a game off 1 market across 1 market source. That is 0 percent of what a quarterback's projection needs, so it is a fragment of one rather than a projection.

Daniel Jones's projection is not complete, so the two figures are not set against each other here.

This season so far

Through Week 5, Fernando Mendoza has been on the field for 17 percent of LV snaps, dropped back 9 times and thrown 5.9 air yards an attempt.

He has been sacked or hit on 1 of 9 dropbacks and scrambled 1 time.

In Week 5 against NE he completed 6 of 8 passes for 48 yards, threw 0 touchdowns and 0 interceptions and ran 1 time for 3 yards.

Through Week 9, Daniel Jones has been on the field for 98 percent of IND snaps, dropped back 337 times and thrown 7.5 air yards an attempt.

He has been sacked or hit on 60 of 337 dropbacks and scrambled 12 times.

In Week 7 against MIN he completed 13 of 22 passes for 108 yards, threw 0 touchdowns and 1 interception and ran 4 times for 13 yards.

In Week 8 against JAX he completed 19 of 28 passes for 144 yards, threw 1 touchdown and 2 interceptions and ran 3 times for 8 yards.

In Week 9 against DAL he completed 20 of 34 passes for 180 yards, threw 1 touchdown and 1 interception and ran 3 times for 11 yards.

Their 2025 seasons

Fernando Mendoza is a rookie, so there is no NFL season behind him to price him against.

In 2025 Daniel Jones played 13 games and scored 234.4 PPR points, 18.0 a game, finishing QB17.

He threw for 3101 yards on 384 attempts with 19 touchdowns and 8 interceptions, and ran for 164 yards and 5 touchdowns.

That came to 29-30 attempts a game at 8.1 yards an attempt.

He was on the field for 91 percent of the snaps in the games he played.

Head to head

This season Daniel Jones holds the bigger snap share, 98 percent against 17 percent.

Their target share this season is the same, 0 percent each.

Byes and availability

Both are off in Week 13, so a roster holding the pair has that one week to cover twice.

What would change the answer

Daniel Jones has only a partial projection, so the market half of this page is whole for only one of them.

Both players in full

Week 10 on the board

Next duels