Should I start Justice Hill or Mark Andrews in Week 9?
Updated Nov 3, 6:26 AM ET. Week 10 answers post Tuesday.
Latest
- : Justice Hill: Listed Questionable (Groin) (Sleeper injury feed)
Start Justice Hill: his market-based projection is 1.3 points a game ahead of Mark Andrews's this season.
Should I drop Justice Hill for Mark Andrews?
Yes, on the rest of the season. Mark Andrews projects 70 market-implied PPR points from Week 9 through Week 17 (8.7 a game over 8 games), Justice Hill 36 (4.5 a game over 8 games). Justice Hill is listed questionable.
Parlae may earn a commission from price links.
Your next move
More fantasy football tools and rankings, all built from the same board.
Both players' season market-based projection, their usage this season and their last full season's numbers.
RB16 · BAL · bye 13
2026 vs rush yds line 4-4
- Market-based projection
- 6.8 pts a game
TE9 · BAL · bye 13
2026 vs anytime td line 1-7
- Market-based projection
- 5.5 pts a game
Make this call for your own roster
Sync your league and My Team sets this week's lineup for your actual roster, spot by spot. Free, no account.
Or get it by email
Tuesday 7am ET: one email with what moved on the board and who is worth a claim.
Free. One a week, one tap to stop.
The gap
- Price difference1.3 points a game
- Board size297 draftable players
Draft data is not current for these two, so the figures that depend on it are left out. The call above comes from the market projection.
The market-based projections
Justice Hill's market-based projection is 6.8 PPR points a game, built from 5 markets across 11 market sources. That is the 27th highest figure of the 175 players with a market-based projection.
Mark Andrews's market-based projection is 5.5 PPR points a game, built from 3 markets across 11 market sources. That is the 31st highest figure of the 175 players with a market-based projection.
Where the draft room stands
Live drafts hold no current pick on Justice Hill, and the board ranks him 53rd overall on the rest of his evidence.
Live drafts hold no current pick on Mark Andrews, and the board ranks him 54th overall on the rest of his evidence.
This season through Week 8
Through Week 8, Justice Hill has been on the field for 43 percent of BAL snaps, taken 11 percent of the carries, drawn 11 percent of the targets and had 4 percent of the red zone chances.
He has taken 10 of the offence's 66 third down targets, had 0 of its 26 chances inside the five and seen 7 of its 47 two minute targets.
His 25 targets have come 1.1 yards behind the line of scrimmage on average.
In Week 6 against CLE he carried 0 times for 0 yards, caught 3 of 3 targets for 9 yards and did not score.
In Week 7 against CIN he carried 3 times for 7 yards, caught 3 of 4 targets for 26 yards and did not score.
In Week 8 against BUF he carried 3 times for 15 yards, caught 4 of 8 targets for 20 yards and did not score.
Through Week 8, Mark Andrews has been on the field for 65 percent of BAL snaps, drawn 18 percent of the targets and had 9 percent of the red zone chances.
He has taken 17 of the offence's 66 third down targets, had 2 of its 26 chances inside the five and seen 7 of its 47 two minute targets.
His 41 targets have averaged 6.6 air yards.
In Week 6 against CLE he caught 1 of 3 targets for 4 yards and did not score.
In Week 7 against CIN he caught 3 of 4 targets for 23 yards and did not score.
In Week 8 against BUF he caught 3 of 4 targets for 14 yards and did not score.
Their 2025 seasons
In 2025 Justice Hill played 10 games and scored 65.2 PPR points, 6.5 a game, finishing RB60.
He carried 18 times for 93 yards and 2 touchdowns, and caught 21 of 27 targets for 169 more yards.
That came to 1.8 carries a game at 5.2 yards a carry and 2.1 catches a game.
He was on the field for 37 percent of the snaps in the games he played.
In 2025 Mark Andrews played 17 games and scored 131.0 PPR points, 7.7 a game, finishing TE16.
He caught 48 of 70 targets for 422 yards and 5 touchdowns, with 14 red zone targets.
That came to 4.1 targets a game, a 69 percent catch rate and 8.8 yards a catch.
He was on the field for 62 percent of the snaps in the games he played.
Mark Andrews was available for 7 games more.
Side by side
In 2025 Mark Andrews scored 7.7 PPR points a game and Justice Hill 6.5, 1.2 a game between them.
Justice Hill finished RB60 and Mark Andrews TE16, which are two different ladders.
Justice Hill is a running back and Mark Andrews a tight end, so the question is which slot you fill first rather than which of them is better.
Byes and availability
Both are off in Week 13, so a roster holding the pair has that one week to cover twice.
Justice Hill is listed as questionable on the injury report.
What would change the answer
1.3 points a game is the entire case. The market restates it every week, and a line that moves moves the order with it.
The draft market is the half that is missing: when live drafts hold these two again they can order them differently from the projection, and this page will follow the drafts rather than the market-based projection when they do.
Drop or keep
Should I drop Justice Hill for Mark Andrews?
Yes, on the rest of the season. Mark Andrews projects 70 market-implied PPR points from Week 9 through Week 17 (8.7 a game over 8 games), Justice Hill 36 (4.5 a game over 8 games). Justice Hill is listed questionable.
Should I drop Mark Andrews for Justice Hill?
No. Keep Mark Andrews: he projects 70 market-implied PPR points from Week 9 through Week 17 (8.7 a game over 8 games), Justice Hill 36 (4.5 a game over 8 games). Justice Hill is listed questionable.
Should I drop Justice Hill?Should I drop Mark Andrews?
Both players in full
Week 9 on the board
- Is Justice Hill playing Week 9?
- Is Mark Andrews playing Week 9?
- Ravens depth chart
- Week 9 RB rankings
- Week 9 TE rankings
- Week 9 fantasy rankings
- Week 9 start or sit
- Week 9 waiver wire
- Week 9 trade value chart
- Trade deadline buy low, sell high
- Fantasy football rankings
- Start 'em sit 'em Week 9
- Waiver wire pickups
- Fantasy sleepers
- Rest of season rankings
- Week 9 kicker rankings
- Week 9 defense rankings







