Skip to main content
parlae.ioBeta
Sign in

Rice or Wirtz? FPL Gameweek 7

Level for Gameweek 7: 3.4 and 3.4 projected points. Deadline Sat, Oct 17, 11:00 AM UK time (6:00 AM ET).

The call

  • Gameweek 7: level, 3.4 projected points for Rice and 3.4 for Wirtz. Rice plays away at Nott'm Forest; Wirtz plays away at Brentford.
  • Next five gameweeks: Wirtz, 17.7 projected points to 17.4.
  • Rice is owned by 11% of managers and Wirtz by 5.2%, so Wirtz is the differential.
GW7
3.4
Next 5
17.4
Price
7.3m

Gameweek 7: NFO (A)

GW7
3.4
Next 5
17.7
Price
7.3m

Gameweek 7: BRE (A)

The pick for next five.

Side by side

RiceWirtz
Projected, next five17.417.7
Projected per million (5 GWs)2.382.42
Expected minutes this GW8478
Start rate100%100%
Expected goals per 900.020.22
Expected assists per 900.140.12
Goals00
Assists32
Season points2720
Form (points a match, 30 days)4.04.0
Owned11%5.2%
Last 5 matches, points a match4.83.6
Transfers this window, net13,597 in17,665 out

Bold is the better number; for ownership, lower is bold because it is the differential.

Advertisement

Fixtures, next five gameweeks

GWRiceWirtz
7NFO (A)3.4BRE (A)3.4
8EVE (H)3.5BHA (H)3.5
9LIV (A)3.4ARS (H)3.4
10HUL (H)3.6CRY (A)3.7
11NEW (A)3.5MUN (H)3.7

More close calls

Common questions

  • Rice or Wirtz for FPL Gameweek 7?

    Gameweek 7: level, 3.4 projected points for Rice and 3.4 for Wirtz. Rice plays away at Nott'm Forest; Wirtz plays away at Brentford.

  • Rice or Wirtz over the next five gameweeks?

    Wirtz: 17.7 projected points to 17.4.

  • Who is the better captain, Rice or Wirtz?

    Neither on these numbers: their Gameweek 7 projections are level.

Parlae is an independent site. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to the Premier League, its clubs or Fantasy Premier League. Prices, ownership, transfer counts and player statistics are read from the game's public data; projections, difficulty grades and every pick on this page are Parlae's own model, not the game's.

By the Parlae deskProjections updated Oct 14, 2026 at 8:52 AM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number