Trade Brock Bowers for Josh Jacobs? No, Bowers is worth 19 more.
No on value. Brock Bowers is worth 64 rest of season and Josh Jacobs 45, so giving up Bowers costs 19. Bowers rates 16.5 market points a game with 9 games left, Jacobs 13.3 with 9. On usage, Bowers has drawn 26 percent of LV targets; Jacobs has 58 percent of GB carries and 17 percent of its targets. Bowers is at NYJ in Week 8 (6th fewest points allowed to TEs); Jacobs hosts CAR in Week 8 (2nd most points allowed to RBs). Brock Bowers is listed Questionable (calf).
The verdict, Week 8
Advertisement
Run this trade in the analyzer
Both sides are filled in. Add a player to either side to check a two for one.
In a dynasty league? Run it in the dynasty trade calculator.
Parlae may earn a commission from price links.
- Pts/game
- 16.5
- Games left
- 9
- Bye
- 13
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 | Wk 6 | Wk 7 | Wk 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.5 | 16.3 | 16.8 | 18.8 | 17.0 | 16.1 |
- Pts/game
- 13.3
- Games left
- 9
- Bye
- 11
| Wk 3 | Wk 4 | Wk 5 | Wk 6 | Wk 7 | Wk 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no projection | no projection | no projection | no projection | 11.3 | 15.4 |
Where the values come from
Bowers is the 2nd tight end on the chart and 23rd overall. His 16.5 a game is 7.1 above the replacement tight end's 9.4, over 9 games left with his bye in Week 13, which is how he comes to 64.
Jacobs is the 16th running back on the chart and 36th overall. His 13.3 a game is 5.0 above the replacement running back's 8.3, over 9 games left with his bye in Week 11, which is how he comes to 45.
The weekly projections
Parlae's market-based projections had Brock Bowers at 11.5 in Week 3, 16.3 in Week 4, 16.8 in Week 5, 18.8 in Week 6, 17.0 in Week 7 and 16.1 in Week 8, a median of 16.5 points a game, up 4.6 from his first frozen week to his latest.
Parlae's market-based projections had Josh Jacobs at 11.3 in Week 7 and 15.4 in Week 8, a median of 13.3 points a game, up 4.1 from his first frozen week to his latest.
Advertisement
Points so far against the price
Brock Bowers has scored 95.5 PPR points in 5 games, 19.1 a game, 2.6 a game more than the 16.5 he is projected for from here.
Last season he finished TE11 with 176.2 PPR points in 12 games, 14.7 a game.
Week 3 vs NO: 27.6 points (TE1 that week), 10 of 14 targets for 116 yards, 1 touchdown, 79 percent of snaps.
Week 4 vs KC: 20.6 points (TE3 that week), 6 of 11 targets for 86 yards, 1 touchdown, 82 percent of snaps.
Week 5 vs NE: 23.0 points (TE2 that week), 8 of 10 targets for 110 yards, 1 touchdown, 70 percent of snaps.
Week 6 vs BUF: 11.0 points (TE15 that week), 4 of 9 targets for 70 yards, 98 percent of snaps.
Week 7 vs LAR: 13.3 points (TE11 that week), 6 of 8 targets for 73 yards, 84 percent of snaps.
Josh Jacobs has scored 20.1 PPR points in 1 game, 20.1 a game, 6.8 a game more than the 13.3 he is projected for from here.
Last season he finished RB13 with 237.1 PPR points in 15 games, 15.8 a game.
Week 7 vs DET: 20.1 points (RB8 that week), 36 rushing yards on 11 carries, 5 of 7 targets for 55 yards, 1 touchdown, 52 percent of snaps.
Usage a game this season
Through Week 7, Brock Bowers has averaged 10.2 targets and 6.8 catches for 91 yards a game on 83 percent of the snaps.
He has been targeted or handed the ball 7 times inside the 20, 14 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 3 touchdowns in 5 games.
In Week 7 against LAR he had 8 targets on 84 percent of the snaps.
Through Week 7, Josh Jacobs has averaged 11.0 carries for 36 yards and 7.0 targets and 5.0 catches for 55 yards a game on 52 percent of the snaps.
He has been targeted or handed the ball 5 times inside the 20, 50 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 1 touchdown in 1 game.
In Week 7 against DET he had 11 carries and 7 targets on 52 percent of the snaps.
Schedule and next matchup
A trade made now buys Week 8 through Week 17. Brock Bowers has 9 games in it with his bye in Week 13; Josh Jacobs has 9 games with his bye in Week 11.
NYJ, Bowers's Week 8 opponent, has allowed 10.4 PPR points a game to TEs this season over 7 games, the 6th fewest to TEs of 32.
CAR, Jacobs's Week 8 opponent, has allowed 28.7 PPR points a game to RBs this season over 6 games, the 2nd most to RBs of 32.
What would even it
The side getting Josh Jacobs would want about 19 more added to make it even: a player like Tucker Kraft, valued at 19. Two players for Bowers also costs that side a roster spot.
Other trades for Brock Bowers and Josh Jacobs

Brock Bowers for Jonathan Taylor64 vs 91
Brock Bowers for CeeDee Lamb64 vs 85
Brock Bowers for James Cook III64 vs 79
Brock Bowers for Kyren Williams64 vs 77
Brock Bowers for Chuba Hubbard64 vs 75
D'Andre Swift for Josh Jacobs63 vs 45
Josh Jacobs for Justin Jefferson45 vs 63
Aaron Jones Sr. for Josh Jacobs58 vs 45
Garrett Wilson for Josh Jacobs57 vs 45
Josh Jacobs for Nico Collins45 vs 57
The full Week 8 trade value chart
Week 8 on the board
- Is Brock Bowers playing Week 8?
- Is Josh Jacobs playing Week 8?
- Raiders depth chart
- Packers depth chart
- Week 8 RB rankings
- Week 8 TE rankings
- Week 8 fantasy rankings
- Week 8 start or sit
- Week 8 waiver wire
- Week 8 trade value chart
- Trade deadline buy low, sell high
- Fantasy football rankings
- Start 'em sit 'em Week 8
- Waiver wire pickups
- Fantasy sleepers
- Rest of season rankings
- Week 8 kicker rankings
- Week 8 defense rankings
Common questions
Should I trade Brock Bowers for Josh Jacobs?
No on value: Brock Bowers is worth 64 and Josh Jacobs 45, a loss of 19. It can still help a lineup that needs a running back more than it needs Bowers.
Who has more rest-of-season value, Brock Bowers or Josh Jacobs?
Brock Bowers, 64 to 45. He rates 16.5 market points a game over 9 games left, against 13.3 over 9 for Josh Jacobs, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.
How are these trade values calculated?
Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based PPR points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. A replacement starter's rate is subtracted and the rest is multiplied by his games from Week 8 to Week 17, bye taken out. No expert opinion is involved.
By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 29, 2026 at 2:51 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number