Skip to main content
parlae.ioBeta
Sign in

Trade CeeDee Lamb for D'Andre Swift? No, Lamb is worth 24 more.

No on value. CeeDee Lamb is worth 100 rest of season and D'Andre Swift 76, so giving up Lamb costs 24. Lamb rates 18.2 market points a game with 11 games left, Swift 14.8 with 11. On usage, Lamb has drawn 32 percent of DAL targets; Swift has 45 percent of CHI carries and 9 percent of its targets. Lamb is at GB in Week 6 (16th most points allowed to WRs); Swift is at ATL in Week 6 (6th fewest points allowed to RBs). CeeDee Lamb is listed Questionable (quadriceps).

The verdict, Week 5

Keeping CeeDee Lamb wins by 24.

CeeDee Lamb 10076 D'Andre Swift

Run this trade in the analyzer

Both sides are filled in. Add a player to either side to check a two for one.

Give Lamb, get SwiftGive Swift, get Lamb

See it against your lineup

Sync your league and the analyzer shows your best starting lineup before and after the deal. Free, no account.

SleeperESPNYahoo

CeeDee Lamb

WR3DALQuestionable

100

value, #10

Pts/game
18.2
Games left
11
Bye
14
CeeDee Lamb weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
18.216.419.2

D'Andre Swift

RB14CHI

76

value, #23

Pts/game
14.8
Games left
11
Bye
10
D'Andre Swift weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5
8.015.714.8

Where the values come from

Lamb is the 3rd receiver on the chart and 10th overall. His 18.2 a game is 9.1 above the replacement receiver's 9.1, over 11 games left with his bye in Week 14, which is how he comes to 100.

Swift is the 14th running back on the chart and 23rd overall. His 14.8 a game is 6.9 above the replacement running back's 7.9, over 11 games left with his bye in Week 10, which is how he comes to 76.

The weekly market prices

The market priced CeeDee Lamb at 18.2 in Week 3, 16.5 in Week 4 and 19.2 in Week 5, a median of 18.2 points a game, up 1.1 from his first frozen week to his latest.

The market priced D'Andre Swift at 8.0 in Week 3, 15.7 in Week 4 and 14.8 in Week 5, a median of 14.8 points a game, up 6.8 from his first frozen week to his latest.

Advertisement

Points so far against the price

CeeDee Lamb has scored 115.1 PPR points in 5 games, 23.0 a game, 4.8 a game more than the 18.2 the market prices him at from here.

Last season he finished WR22 with 200.9 PPR points in 14 games, 14.4 a game.

Week 1 vs NYG: 15.4 points (WR20 that week), 0 rushing yards on 1 carry, 5 of 8 targets for 44 yards, 1 touchdown, 81 percent of snaps.

Week 2 vs WAS: 35.3 points (WR3 that week), 8 of 9 targets for 153 yards, 2 touchdowns, 75 percent of snaps.

Week 3 vs BAL: 20.2 points (WR11 that week), 7 of 8 targets for 112 yards, 82 percent of snaps.

Week 4 vs HOU: 41.3 points (WR2 that week), -6 rushing yards on 1 carry, 17 of 21 targets for 189 yards, 1 touchdown, 86 percent of snaps.

Week 5 vs TB: 2.9 points (WR82 that week), 2 of 5 targets for 9 yards.

D'Andre Swift has scored 80.8 PPR points in 5 games, 16.2 a game, 1.4 a game more than the 14.8 the market prices him at from here.

Last season he finished RB15 with 228.6 PPR points in 16 games, 14.3 a game.

Week 1 vs CAR: 32.4 points (RB5 that week), 124 rushing yards on 18 carries, 1 of 1 target for 10 yards, 3 touchdowns, 57 percent of snaps.

Week 2 vs MIN: 12.9 points (RB16 that week), 45 rushing yards on 16 carries, 5 of 6 targets for 54 yards, 68 percent of snaps.

Week 3 vs PHI: 10.8 points (RB23 that week), 84 rushing yards on 20 carries, 2 of 3 targets for 4 yards, 69 percent of snaps.

Week 4 vs NYJ: 7.4 points (RB37 that week), 58 rushing yards on 15 carries, 2 of 2 targets for 16 yards, 35 percent of snaps.

Week 5 vs GB: 17.3 points (RB9 that week), 43 rushing yards on 9 carries, 4 of 5 targets for 30 yards, 1 touchdown.

Usage a game this season

Through Week 4, CeeDee Lamb has averaged 0.5 carries for -1 yards and 11.5 targets and 9.3 catches for 125 yards a game on 82 percent of the snaps.

He has been targeted or handed the ball 6 times inside the 20, 13 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 4 touchdowns in 4 games.

In Week 4 against HOU he had 1 carry and 21 targets on 86 percent of the snaps.

Through Week 4, D'Andre Swift has averaged 17.3 carries for 78 yards and 2.8 targets and 2.5 catches for 21 yards a game on 56 percent of the snaps.

He has been targeted or handed the ball 20 times inside the 20, 31 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 3 touchdowns in 4 games.

In Week 4 against NYJ he had 15 carries and 2 targets on 35 percent of the snaps.

Schedule and next matchup

A trade made now buys Week 6 through Week 17. CeeDee Lamb has 11 games in it with his bye in Week 14; D'Andre Swift has 11 games with his bye in Week 10.

GB, Lamb's Week 6 opponent, has allowed 32.8 PPR points a game to WRs this season over 4 games, the 16th most to WRs of 32.

ATL, Swift's Week 6 opponent, has allowed 16.9 PPR points a game to RBs this season over 4 games, the 6th fewest to RBs of 32.

What would even it

The side getting D'Andre Swift would want about 24 more added to make it even: a player like Jameson Williams, valued at 24. Two players for Lamb also costs that side a roster spot.

Jameson Williams's player page

Other trades for CeeDee Lamb and D'Andre Swift

The full Week 5 trade value chart

Common questions

  • Should I trade CeeDee Lamb for D'Andre Swift?

    No on value: CeeDee Lamb is worth 100 and D'Andre Swift 76, a loss of 24. It can still help a lineup that needs a running back more than it needs Lamb.

  • Who has more rest-of-season value, CeeDee Lamb or D'Andre Swift?

    CeeDee Lamb, 100 to 76. He rates 18.2 market points a game over 11 games left, against 14.8 over 11 for D'Andre Swift, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.

  • How are these trade values calculated?

    Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based PPR points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5. A replacement starter's rate is subtracted and the rest is multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17, bye taken out. No expert opinion is involved.

By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 12, 2026 at 9:06 AM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number