Skip to main content
parlae.ioBeta
Sign in

Trade CeeDee Lamb for Kenneth Walker? Yes, Walker is worth 27 more.

Yes on value. Kenneth Walker is worth 133 rest of season and CeeDee Lamb 106, so the side getting Walker gains 27. Lamb rates 18.0 market points a game with 11 games left, Walker 19.0 with 12. On usage, Lamb has drawn 27 percent of DAL targets; Walker has 76 percent of KC carries and 16 percent of its targets. Lamb is at GB in Week 6 (14th fewest points allowed to WRs); Walker hosts LAC in Week 6 (13th most points allowed to RBs). Neither carries an injury designation this week.

The verdict, Week 6

Getting Kenneth Walker wins by 27.

CeeDee Lamb 106133 Kenneth Walker

Run this trade in the analyzer

Both sides are filled in. Add a player to either side to check a two for one.

Give Lamb, get WalkerGive Walker, get Lamb

In a dynasty league? Run it in the dynasty trade calculator.

See it against your lineup

Sync your league and the analyzer shows your best starting lineup before and after the deal. Free, no account.

SleeperESPNYahoo

CeeDee Lamb

WR4DAL

106

value, #9

Pts/game
18.0
Games left
11
Bye
14
CeeDee Lamb weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5Wk 6
18.216.419.217.9

Kenneth Walker

RB3KC

133

value, #3

Pts/game
19.0
Games left
12
Bye
5
Kenneth Walker weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5Wk 6
20.919.0not priced14.6

Where the values come from

Lamb is the 4th receiver on the chart and 9th overall. His 18.0 a game is 9.6 above the replacement receiver's 8.4, over 11 games left with his bye in Week 14, which is how he comes to 106.

Walker is the 3rd running back on the chart and 3rd overall. His 19.0 a game is 11.1 above the replacement running back's 7.9, over 12 games left with no bye left, which is how he comes to 133.

The weekly projections

Parlae's market-based projections had CeeDee Lamb at 18.2 in Week 3, 16.5 in Week 4, 19.2 in Week 5 and 17.9 in Week 6, a median of 18.0 points a game, flat across them.

Parlae's market-based projections had Kenneth Walker at 21.0 in Week 3, 19.0 in Week 4 and 14.6 in Week 6, a median of 19.0 points a game, down 6.4 from his first frozen week to his latest.

Advertisement

Points so far against the price

CeeDee Lamb has scored 115.1 PPR points in 5 games, 23.0 a game, 5.0 a game more than the 18.0 he is projected for from here.

Last season he finished WR22 with 200.9 PPR points in 14 games, 14.4 a game.

Week 1 vs NYG: 15.4 points (WR20 that week), 0 rushing yards on 1 carry, 5 of 8 targets for 44 yards, 1 touchdown, 81 percent of snaps.

Week 2 vs WAS: 35.3 points (WR3 that week), 8 of 9 targets for 153 yards, 2 touchdowns, 75 percent of snaps.

Week 3 vs BAL: 20.2 points (WR11 that week), 7 of 8 targets for 112 yards, 82 percent of snaps.

Week 4 vs HOU: 41.3 points (WR2 that week), -6 rushing yards on 1 carry, 17 of 21 targets for 189 yards, 1 touchdown, 86 percent of snaps.

Week 5 vs TB: 2.9 points (WR86 that week), 2 of 5 targets for 9 yards, 57 percent of snaps.

Kenneth Walker has scored 110.1 PPR points in 4 games, 27.5 a game, 8.5 a game more than the 19.0 he is projected for from here.

Last season he finished RB22 with 191.9 PPR points in 17 games with SEA, 11.3 a game.

Week 1 vs DEN: 34.1 points (RB2 that week), 173 rushing yards on 23 carries, 3 of 6 targets for 18 yards, 2 touchdowns, 68 percent of snaps.

Week 2 vs IND: 23.8 points (RB2 that week), 117 rushing yards on 24 carries, 6 of 10 targets for 61 yards, 83 percent of snaps.

Week 3 vs MIA: 21.3 points (RB7 that week), 70 rushing yards on 18 carries, 2 of 2 targets for 3 yards, 2 touchdowns, 73 percent of snaps.

Week 4 vs LV: 30.9 points (RB3 that week), 177 rushing yards on 22 carries, 1 of 1 target for 2 yards, 2 touchdowns, 75 percent of snaps.

Usage a game this season

Through Week 5, CeeDee Lamb has averaged 10.2 targets and 7.8 catches for 101 yards a game on 77 percent of the snaps.

He has been targeted or handed the ball 6 times inside the 20, 11 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 4 touchdowns in 5 games.

In Week 5 against TB he had 5 targets on 57 percent of the snaps.

Through Week 4, Kenneth Walker has averaged 21.8 carries for 134 yards and 4.8 targets and 3.0 catches for 21 yards a game on 75 percent of the snaps.

He has been targeted or handed the ball 24 times inside the 20, 56 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 6 touchdowns in 4 games.

In Week 4 against LV he had 22 carries and 1 target on 75 percent of the snaps.

Schedule and next matchup

A trade made now buys Week 6 through Week 17. CeeDee Lamb has 11 games in it with his bye in Week 14; Kenneth Walker has 12 games with no bye left.

GB, Lamb's Week 6 opponent, has allowed 30.3 PPR points a game to WRs this season over 5 games, the 14th fewest to WRs of 32.

LAC, Walker's Week 6 opponent, has allowed 21.7 PPR points a game to RBs this season over 5 games, the 13th most to RBs of 32.

What would even it

The side getting CeeDee Lamb would want about 27 more added to make it even: a player like DJ Moore, valued at 29. Two players for Walker also costs that side a roster spot.

DJ Moore's player page

Other trades for CeeDee Lamb and Kenneth Walker

The full Week 6 trade value chart

Common questions

  • Should I trade CeeDee Lamb for Kenneth Walker?

    Yes on value: Kenneth Walker is worth 133 and CeeDee Lamb 106, a gain of 27. If CeeDee Lamb starts for you and Kenneth Walker would sit, check the lineup first in the trade analyzer.

  • Who has more rest-of-season value, CeeDee Lamb or Kenneth Walker?

    Kenneth Walker, 133 to 106. He rates 19.0 market points a game over 12 games left, against 18.0 over 11 for CeeDee Lamb, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.

  • How are these trade values calculated?

    Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based PPR points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6. A replacement starter's rate is subtracted and the rest is multiplied by his games from Week 6 to Week 17, bye taken out. No expert opinion is involved.

By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 15, 2026 at 12:01 AM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number