Skip to main content

Trade Malik Nabers for Saquon Barkley? No, Nabers is worth 9 more.

No on value. Malik Nabers is worth 37 rest of season and Saquon Barkley 28, so giving up Nabers costs 9. Nabers rates 13.2 market points a game with 9 games left, Barkley 11.4 with 9. On usage, Nabers has drawn 30 percent of NYG targets; Barkley has 34 percent of PHI carries and 6 percent of its targets. Nabers is on bye in Week 8; Barkley is at WAS in Week 8 (7th fewest points allowed to RBs). Saquon Barkley is listed Questionable (back).

The verdict, Week 8

Keeping Malik Nabers wins by 9.

Malik Nabers 3728 Saquon Barkley

Advertisement

Run this trade in the analyzer

Both sides are filled in. Add a player to either side to check a two for one.

In a dynasty league? Run it in the dynasty trade calculator.

See it against your lineup

Sync your league and the analyzer shows your best starting lineup before and after the deal. Free, no account.

Parlae may earn a commission from price links.

37

value, #43

Pts/game
13.2
Games left
9
Bye
8
Malik Nabers weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5Wk 6Wk 7Wk 8
12.012.413.215.414.5no projection

RB21PHIQuestionable

28

value, #46

Pts/game
11.4
Games left
9
Bye
10
Saquon Barkley weekly market-based points
Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5Wk 6Wk 7Wk 8
15.513.63.9no projection11.33.4

Where the values come from

Nabers is the 20th receiver on the chart and 43rd overall. His 13.2 a game is 4.1 above the replacement receiver's 9.1, over 9 games left with his bye in Week 8, which is how he comes to 37.

Barkley is the 21st running back on the chart and 46th overall. His 11.4 a game is 3.1 above the replacement running back's 8.3, over 9 games left with his bye in Week 10, which is how he comes to 28.

The weekly projections

Parlae's market-based projections had Malik Nabers at 12.0 in Week 3, 12.4 in Week 4, 13.2 in Week 5, 15.4 in Week 6 and 14.5 in Week 7, a median of 13.2 points a game, up 2.6 from his first frozen week to his latest.

Parlae's market-based projections had Saquon Barkley at 15.5 in Week 3, 13.6 in Week 4, 3.9 in Week 5, 11.4 in Week 7 and 3.4 in Week 8, a median of 11.4 points a game, down 12.1 from his first frozen week to his latest.

Advertisement

Points so far against the price

Malik Nabers has scored 120.5 PPR points in 7 games, 17.2 a game, 4.0 a game more than the 13.2 he is projected for from here.

Last season he finished WR101 with 57.1 PPR points in 4 games, 14.3 a game.

Week 1 vs DAL: 12.9 points (WR26 that week), 6 of 9 targets for 69 yards, 52 percent of snaps.

Week 2 vs LAR: 1.1 points (WR116 that week), 1 of 4 targets for 1 yards, 74 percent of snaps.

Week 3 vs TEN: 7.6 points (WR57 that week), 5 of 6 targets for 26 yards, 78 percent of snaps.

Week 4 vs ARI: 23.2 points (WR10 that week), 6 of 7 targets for 112 yards, 1 touchdown, 76 percent of snaps.

Week 5 vs WAS: 29.1 points (WR4 that week), 11 of 20 targets for 121 yards, 1 touchdown, 90 percent of snaps.

Week 6 vs NO: 28.5 points (WR1 that week), 12 of 15 targets for 165 yards, 86 percent of snaps.

Week 7 vs HOU: 18.1 points (WR15 that week), 7 of 9 targets for 111 yards, 73 percent of snaps.

Saquon Barkley has scored 38.1 PPR points in 5 games, 7.6 a game, 3.8 a game less than the 11.4 he is projected for from here.

Last season he finished RB14 with 232.3 PPR points in 16 games, 14.5 a game.

Week 1 vs WAS: 9.0 points (RB30 that week), 83 rushing yards on 15 carries, 1 of 2 targets for -3 yards, 71 percent of snaps.

Week 2 vs TEN: 3.0 points (RB58 that week), 9 rushing yards on 4 carries, 1 of 2 targets for 11 yards, 16 percent of snaps.

Week 3 vs CHI: 9.0 points (RB32 that week), 82 rushing yards on 15 carries, 1 of 2 targets for -2 yards, 72 percent of snaps.

Week 4 vs LAR: 2.0 points (RB62 that week), 8 rushing yards on 2 carries, 1 of 1 target for 2 yards, 7 percent of snaps.

Week 7 vs DAL: 15.1 points (RB20 that week), 62 rushing yards on 7 carries, 2 of 2 targets for 9 yards, 1 touchdown, 16 percent of snaps.

Usage a game this season

Through Week 7, Malik Nabers has averaged 10.0 targets and 6.9 catches for 86 yards a game on 76 percent of the snaps.

He has been targeted or handed the ball 8 times inside the 20, 15 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 2 touchdowns in 7 games.

In Week 7 against HOU he had 9 targets on 73 percent of the snaps.

Through Week 7, Saquon Barkley has averaged 8.6 carries for 49 yards and 1.8 targets and 1.2 catches for 3 yards a game on 33 percent of the snaps.

He has been targeted or handed the ball 8 times inside the 20, 17 percent of his team's chances there, and has scored 1 touchdown in 5 games.

In Week 7 against DAL he had 7 carries and 2 targets on 16 percent of the snaps.

Schedule and next matchup

A trade made now buys Week 8 through Week 17. Malik Nabers has 9 games in it with his bye in Week 8; Saquon Barkley has 9 games with his bye in Week 10.

WAS, Barkley's Week 8 opponent, has allowed 19.0 PPR points a game to RBs this season over 6 games, the 7th fewest to RBs of 32.

What would even it

The side getting Saquon Barkley would want about 9 more added to make it even: a player like Malik Washington, valued at 9. Two players for Nabers also costs that side a roster spot.

Malik Washington's player page

The full Week 8 trade value chart

Week 8 on the board

Common questions

  • Should I trade Malik Nabers for Saquon Barkley?

    No on value: Malik Nabers is worth 37 and Saquon Barkley 28, a loss of 9. It can still help a lineup that needs a running back more than it needs Nabers.

  • Who has more rest-of-season value, Malik Nabers or Saquon Barkley?

    Malik Nabers, 37 to 28. He rates 13.2 market points a game over 9 games left, against 11.4 over 9 for Saquon Barkley, each measured above a replacement starter at his own position.

  • How are these trade values calculated?

    Each player's points per game is the median of the market-based PPR points we froze before each week's first kickoff, Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. A replacement starter's rate is subtracted and the rest is multiplied by his games from Week 8 to Week 17, bye taken out. No expert opinion is involved.

By the Parlae deskValues updated Oct 29, 2026 at 2:51 PM ETHow this is builtReport a wrong number