Skip to main content

Should I start Malik Nabers or Justin Jefferson in Week 9?

Updated Nov 3, 5:01 AM ET.

Week 9 verdict

Start

WR · MIN · vs BUF

Market projects
16.3
recent weeks avg
BUF D vs WR
42.3
most to WRs (2026)
Snap share
77%
Through Week 8
Target share
27%
Through Week 8
Sit

WR · NYG · at PHI

Market projects
15.1
recent weeks avg
PHI D vs WR
40.1
2nd most to WRs (2026)
Snap share
76%
Through Week 7
Target share
30%
Through Week 7
Start Jefferson or Nabers? The full Week 9 breakdown

Start Justin Jefferson over Malik Nabers in Week 9: 16.3 to 15.1 PPR points a game over recent weeks. Jefferson faces BUF, which allows the most fantasy points to WRs.

Should I drop Malik Nabers for Justin Jefferson?

Yes, on the rest of the season. Justin Jefferson projects 139 market-implied PPR points from Week 9 through Week 17 (15.4 a game over 9 games), Malik Nabers 119 (13.2 a game over 9 games). For Week 9 the call starts Justin Jefferson over Malik Nabers.

Parlae may earn a commission from price links.

Advertisement

Your next move

More fantasy football tools and rankings, all built from the same board.

Neither man carries a season projection right now, so this is their usage this season and their last full season's numbers, side by side.

WR34 · NYG · bye 8

2026 vs anytime td line 2-5

Overall rank
85

WR36 · MIN · bye 6

2026 vs anytime td line 3-3

Market-based projection
16.6 pts a game Wk 8 price
Overall rank
88

Make this call for your own roster

Sync your league and My Team sets this week's lineup for your actual roster, spot by spot. Free, no account.

Sync my league

Or get it by email

Tuesday 7am ET: one email with what moved on the board and who is worth a claim.

Free. One a week, one tap to stop.

The gap

  • Board size297 draftable players

Draft data is not current for these two, so the figures that depend on it are left out. The call above comes from each player's usage.

Where the draft room stands

Live drafts hold no current pick on Malik Nabers, and the board ranks him 85th overall on the rest of his evidence.

By format he goes standard: ADP 12; 2QB: ADP 27.

Live drafts hold no current pick on Justin Jefferson, and the board ranks him 88th overall on the rest of his evidence.

By format he goes standard: ADP 4; 2QB: ADP 15.

The market-based projections

The market-based projection for Malik Nabers is 2.8 PPR points a game off 1 market across 5 market sources. That is 30 percent of what a wide receiver's projection needs, so it is a fragment of one rather than a projection.

The market-based projection for Justin Jefferson is 2.7 PPR points a game off 1 market across 5 market sources. That is 30 percent of what a wide receiver's projection needs, so it is a fragment of one rather than a projection.

Malik Nabers's projection is not complete, so the two figures are not set against each other here.

This season so far

Through Week 7, Malik Nabers has been on the field for 76 percent of NYG snaps, drawn 30 percent of the targets and had 15 percent of the red zone chances.

He has taken 15 of the offence's 61 third down targets, had 2 of its 13 chances inside the five and seen 12 of its 32 two minute targets.

His 70 targets have averaged 11.6 air yards.

In Week 5 against WAS he caught 11 of 20 targets for 121 yards and scored 1 touchdown.

In Week 6 against NO he caught 12 of 15 targets for 165 yards and did not score.

In Week 7 against HOU he caught 7 of 9 targets for 111 yards and did not score.

Through Week 8, Justin Jefferson has been on the field for 77 percent of MIN snaps, drawn 27 percent of the targets and had 19 percent of the red zone chances.

He has taken 18 of the offence's 56 third down targets, had 1 of its 4 chances inside the five and seen 3 of its 12 two minute targets.

His 40 targets have averaged 10.0 air yards.

In Week 5 against NO he carried 1 time for -11 yards, caught 6 of 7 targets for 79 yards and scored 1 touchdown.

In Week 7 against IND he caught 4 of 7 targets for 44 yards and did not score.

In Week 8 against DET he caught 5 of 9 targets for 33 yards and scored 1 touchdown.

Their 2025 seasons

In 2025 Malik Nabers played 4 games and scored 57.1 PPR points, 14.3 a game, finishing WR101.

He caught 18 of 35 targets for 271 yards and 2 touchdowns, with 3 red zone targets.

That came to 8.8 targets a game, a 51 percent catch rate and 15.1 yards a catch.

He was on the field for 78 percent of the snaps in the games he played.

In 2025 Justin Jefferson played 17 games and scored 201.5 PPR points, 11.9 a game, finishing WR21.

He caught 84 of 141 targets for 1048 yards and 2 touchdowns, with 17 red zone targets.

That came to 8.3 targets a game, a 60 percent catch rate and 13 yards a catch.

He was on the field for 95 percent of the snaps in the games he played.

Justin Jefferson was available for 13 games more.

Head to head

In 2025 Malik Nabers scored 14.3 PPR points a game and Justin Jefferson 11.9, 2.4 a game between them.

Malik Nabers finished WR101 that year and Justin Jefferson WR21.

Justin Jefferson had 106 more targets than Malik Nabers, 141 to 35.

Justin Jefferson had 777 more receiving yards than Malik Nabers, 1048 to 271.

This season Justin Jefferson holds the bigger snap share, 77 percent against 76 percent.

This season Malik Nabers holds the bigger target share, 30 percent against 27 percent.

Byes and availability

Malik Nabers is off in Week 8 and Justin Jefferson in Week 6, so either can cover the other's bye.

Drop or keep

  • Should I drop Malik Nabers for Justin Jefferson?

    Yes, on the rest of the season. Justin Jefferson projects 139 market-implied PPR points from Week 9 through Week 17 (15.4 a game over 9 games), Malik Nabers 119 (13.2 a game over 9 games). For Week 9 the call starts Justin Jefferson over Malik Nabers.

  • Should I drop Justin Jefferson for Malik Nabers?

    No. Keep Justin Jefferson: he projects 139 market-implied PPR points from Week 9 through Week 17 (15.4 a game over 9 games), Malik Nabers 119 (13.2 a game over 9 games). For Week 9 the call starts Justin Jefferson over Malik Nabers.

Both players in full

Week 9 on the board

Next duels